A "What If" I could live with.....

Say it all here
Forum rules
NOTICE: Please be sure to check the CFP Message Board Rules and Regulations and the Read Me page before posting.
mountainman

Postby mountainman » Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:27 pm

Sounds like a good time to crack open a mason jar to me. :lol:

User avatar
wvjohn
Coordinator
Coordinator
Posts: 830
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 3:06 pm
Location: Kermit, West Virginia Almost Heaven

Postby wvjohn » Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:30 pm

You know what, I was thinking the same thing: 1st play DEEP pass to Raynaud to start things out, that would have them thinking.
Big 12

FEAR NONE RESPECT ALL

IT IS A GREAT DAY TO BE A MOUNTAINEER WHERE EVER YOU MAY BE

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 20979
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Postby Spence » Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:44 pm

I'm not saying WVU shouldn't pass the ball, but you have to do what got you there. If WVU tries to win by primarily passing the ball they will lose the game. They may have the best TB in all of CFB they will win or lose on the strength of Slaton and White's legs. There is a reason they don't throw the ball a lot. Rodriguez isn't a dummy. If they could pass for 250 and rush for 250, he would do it. One pass to start the game isn't what I am talking about, but you don't want them trying to be something they aren't.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
donovan
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 8634
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Postby donovan » Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:22 am

Louisville by 14. Much tougher team than given credit for.
Statistics are the Morphine of College Football

mountainman

Postby mountainman » Tue Oct 31, 2006 9:33 am

Hmmmmm ....... Have you checked the polls and rankings lately? :roll:

By the way donovan, have you sent the Hokies a "Thank You" note yet?

User avatar
donovan
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 8634
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Postby donovan » Tue Oct 31, 2006 11:52 am

mountainman wrote:Hmmmmm ....... Have you checked the polls and rankings lately? :roll:

By the way donovan, have you sent the Hokies a "Thank You" note yet?


I am so ungrateful, I have not...but I will....

I am hoping, but frankly, Boise St has some real issues. Although this Johnson is a savy runner.
Statistics are the Morphine of College Football

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 20979
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Postby Spence » Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:36 am

I wasn't either. :wink: Welcome to the board.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 20979
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Postby Spence » Thu Nov 02, 2006 6:04 pm

No arguments that McFadden is good. he is also a more complete player then Slaton. As a pure runner, though, I still take Slaton. It isn't a knock on McFadden, I just think Slaton is that good. Remember this kid is a true sophomore.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 20979
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Postby Spence » Thu Nov 02, 2006 6:57 pm

If Peterson is still in the mix I would put him ahead of all of them. I wasn't including him because he is out.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 20979
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Postby Spence » Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:22 pm

I thought he was a redshirt. In any case I like Slaton. He looks like Gayle Sayers when he runs.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
..fanatic
Coordinator
Coordinator
Posts: 957
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 9:55 pm
Location: Rockledge, FL

Postby ..fanatic » Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:23 am

That was a good game - worthy of the hype. Take away Steve Slaton's 2 fumbles and it's a different matter. I wouldn't be too harsh on Slaton if I were an 'Eers fan, either. He may have had two bad slip-ups but his running, and receiving, helped keep West Virginia's hopes alive. The disappointment has to be in the defense which just wasn't able to shut down a fairly one-dimensional attack by Louisville.
"Better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it."

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 20979
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Postby Spence » Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:39 am

It would be wrong to blame Slaton. Without him, West Virginia isn't the same team. He is something. It just wasn't his night. Over 150 yards and it wasn't his night. :shock:
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

User avatar
donovan
Athletic Director
Athletic Director
Posts: 8634
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Pacific Northwest

Postby donovan » Fri Nov 03, 2006 1:54 am

donovan wrote:Louisville by 14. Much tougher team than given credit for.


So it was 10. I thought the game was not the caliber on either side that I had in my mind. Too many mistakes...Coaches were not in control of their teams....
Statistics are the Morphine of College Football

User avatar
Spence
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 20979
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Chillicothe, Ohio (Ohio's First Capital)
Contact:

Postby Spence » Fri Nov 03, 2006 2:11 am

It was a huge game for both schools. It is hard to have your players act like they have been there before when they haven't. This game wasn't for just a BCS bowl bid. It wasn't for just a conference championship. It was for a likely National Championship bowl bid. It is hard for a coach to keep his players emotions in check in a game like that. Both teams played with a lot of emotion. Both teams kept fighting. Yes it was sloppy, but the experience gained will help both teams adjust to the conditions of playing for such big stakes. It makes it easier the next time.

I thought Brohm would have problems throwing the ball. He didn't have many. Thatkid has good poise under pressure. Games like these are these are something you can't duplicate. Big games that have high stakes. No one knows how they will react until they are in that position.
"History doesn't always repeat itself but it often rhymes." - Mark Twain

mountainman

Postby mountainman » Fri Nov 03, 2006 8:18 am

..fanatic wrote:The disappointment has to be in the defense which just wasn't able to shut down a fairly one-dimensional attack by Louisville.


Yep, the Mountaineer's inability to get the Cardinal offense off the field and get the ball in the hands of the offense spelled 'doom' for their chance to win the game. Played the Cardinal's running game well, but did not come close to handling their passing game ....... not even close.


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests